Obama, Romney, and the Foreign Policy Debate
The most disturbing aspect of the final presidential debate was the similarity between the two candidates on many basic foreign policy issues.
The most disturbing aspect of the final presidential debate was the similarity between the two candidates on many basic foreign policy issues.
Arnold Oliver recaps the lessons of the Cuban Missile Crisis 50 years ago, reminding us of how lucky we were and still are that Moscow and Washington didn’t exchange nuclear blows.
Moscow and Washington almost blew up the world during the Cuban Missile Crisis over a misunderstanding.
Mitt Romney is playing the same cynical game as Benjamin Netanyahu.
Mitt Romney is playing the same cynical game as Benjamin Netanyahu.
A prominent disarmament and nonproliferation advocate gives his surprise endorsement to an attack on Iran.
On Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s personal tachometer of war, the needle is always at the red line.
A pretext for the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in European states is to free them from the need to develop nuclear weapons.
Battlefield, or “tactical,” nuclear weapons may be more of a threat than the larger “strategic” warheads.
Barack Obama is a smart guy. So why has he spent the last four years executing such a dumb foreign policy?
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s demand that a “clear red line” be set on Iran is ironic in light of Israel’s policy of strategic ambiguity toward its own nuclear weapons.
It becomes more and more difficult to pretend that Israel doesn’t have a nuclear-weapons program and that Iran does.
The West insists on nuclear nonproliferation, but refuses to reciprocate with meaningful disarmament.
The West insists on nuclear nonproliferation, but refuses to reciprocate with meaningful disarmament.
The West insists on nuclear nonproliferation, but refuses to reciprocate with meaningful disarmament.