Can Our ‘Labs of Democracy’ Once Again Deliver?
In the near future, our states will have to determine whether we truly tax the rich.
In the near future, our states will have to determine whether we truly tax the rich.
Billionaire fortunes have shriveled a bit over the past year. Billionaire power hasn’t.
That bold a hike, our U.S. history suggests, can actually happen.
The world’s wealthy already operate by a different set of rules and laws. But allowing the full scale carveout and manipulation of U.S. state trust law to serve their interests should not be one of them.
President Gustavo Petro’s government plans to raise $20 trillion Colombian pesos through a hyper-targeted tax on less than one percent of the country’s top earners. Other nations should take notice.
A little history might just inspire us to try that taxing again.
As Twitter implodes under Musk’s rule, a lawsuit argues Tesla is vastly overpaying the world’s richest man.
Black students have had to take out larger loans and faced greater difficulty paying them back than other borrowers.
Cities and states are experimenting with trust fund accounts to narrow the racial wealth divide.
This provision of the Inflation Reduction Act will discourage corporations from siphoning resources from worker wages and productive investments for share repurchases that inflate CEO pay.
Superstar Juan Soto gets a new team. His fans get heartbreak. His owners get richer.
A new joint report from Fight Inequality Alliance, Institute for Policy Studies, Oxfam, and Patriotic Millionaires details what can be funded by simply taxing the rich.
The wealthy rob governments of at least $200 billion a year in lost tax revenues. It’s time to force them to pay up.
The Republican tax law boosted the fortunes of America’s wealthiest while increasing insecurity for U.S. manufacturing workers.
He believed the estate tax was an “economic opportunity recycling program.”