Afghanistan under the Knife
We’ve stuck a knife deep into Afghanistan. With bin Laden dead, should we take it out or keep it in?
We’ve stuck a knife deep into Afghanistan. With bin Laden dead, should we take it out or keep it in?
Phyllis Bennis: Message sent to Arab world was unilateral power, not justice.
In the war between the United States and al-Qaeda, the big winner is: China.
Despite the passion of the White House throngs, Osama bin Laden’s death is no “mission accomplished.”
We have, once again, played right into Osama bin Laden’s hands.
In the midst of the Arab Spring, which directly rejects al-Qaeda-style small-group violence in favor of mass-based, society-wide mobilization and non-violent protest to challenge dictatorship and corruption, does the killing of Osama bin Laden represent ultimate justice, or even an end to the “unfinished business” of 9/11?
There are limits to Greg Mortenson’s model of change.
Despite improved drone-strike accuracy in Pakistan, innocents are still killed.
In 10 weeks of protests, Tunisians and Egyptians achieved for themselves what 10 years of bloodshed could not purchase for Pax Americana or its archenemy in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Our illegal nuclear deal with India goads Pakistan to expand its illegal nuclear program.
All the members of the committee writing Egypt’s new constitution are men.
The Raymond Davis incident encapsulates the growing estrangement between the two countries over their respective strategies in Afghanistan.
The Raymond Davis case is a magnet for conspiracy theories.
Religious extremists are using Pakistan’s blasphemy law to challenge the country’s traditions of tolerance.
Nine years into the war in Afghanistan, the costs still aren’t worth the price paid.