Instead of dieting together, the Pentagon is trying to keep our NATO allies fat and unhappy.
Nurses vs. high-speed traders. Now there’s a match-up you probably never thought you’d see playing out in the streets of Chicago.
Missile defense is a bottomless fund of misinformation between the United States and Russia.
Come November, someone’s going to have to tell the next president the hard news: the emperor has no alliance.
The United States can’t abandon the country, but our troops must leave.
Conventional wisdom holds that NATO bombing saved countless lives.
Body counts would be embarrassing.
In this strategic dialogue, Michael Berube and David Gibbs reply to each other’s initial essays on the legacy of the NATO intervention in Libya.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime must step down immediately–without Western military intervention.
The immediate future of Libya will be determined overwhelmingly by the Libyan people themselves. Critics of NATO’s intervention in Libya should explain whether this outcome is unacceptable to them, and if so, why.
The NATO intervention in Libya is likely to produce a more militarized and insecure world, and this will be its most enduring legacy.
Washington can’t seem to grasp a decline, that the rest of the world sees, in its once undisputed world power. It cannot keep its home in good repair, but it still acts as if it can make other nations bend to its will.
Was the NATO attack that killed 25 Pakistani soldiers an accident or an attempt to torpedo peace talks?
Many Afghans are angry at Pakistan for aiding the Taliban.
Not everyone is outraged by the NATO airstrike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.