Some see Putin’s Russia as a counterweight to U.S. global meddling. But Moscow is increasingly mimicking Washington’s worst behavior.
Far-right nationalists and neoliberal capitalists will survive the demise of institutions like the EU. What about the rest of us?
Clinton is right: Trump would be a disaster on foreign policy. But her refusal to engage with the alternative offered by Sanders says more about her own war-driven approach than anything else.
Donald Trump should lose in November. But when you add a joker to the game, it throws off the odds.
Does the European idea still inspire the Union’s better angels, or is it a spent force?
By embracing a neoliberal, pro-austerity agenda, Poland’s mainstream left opened the way for a government of Polish Ted Cruzes.
Let’s say the U.S. actually curbed its military adventurism, reeled in the Pentagon budget, and closed its global network of bases. Then what?
Washington is responsible for a plethora of global calamities. But Putin’s Russia isn’t offering an appealing alternative at all.
If Ukraine wants to move closer to the West, it will probably have to submit to the knife.
Vladimir Putin is not reviving the Cold War. Rather, the U.S. failed to end it when it had the chance.
Obama’s declaration that “America must move off a permanent war footing” wasn’t the Wow! moment it should have been during his State of the Union address.
Bolivia’s President Evo Morales — no place to land.
Republicans oppose U.S. cooperation with Russia on NATO missile defense.
Why is the Obama administration pressing Europeans to increase military spending? And what should it matter to Washington if Britain remains in the EU?
An apology is empty if you have no intention of changing your ways.