
The Audacity of Free Trade Agreements
President Obama is reversing his earlier commitment to a new kind of trade relationship with the world by pushing three ill-conceived FTAs.
President Obama is reversing his earlier commitment to a new kind of trade relationship with the world by pushing three ill-conceived FTAs.
A limitless world of sweatshops isn’t good for anyone.
The U.S.-Colombia free trade pact would reinforce a system that leaves farmers and consumers at the mercy of volatile prices and markets.
How come your teeth are so long, Grandma?
Government efforts to finance job creation and other public goods can clash with subsidies restrictions in trade agreements.
There’s only one Colombian industry that can potentially employ workers who would lose their job in the wake of a free trade deal.
Obama’s trade representative is trying hard to push approval of deals that the Bush administration negotiated.
What might have been a high-profile trip heralding a new U.S. partnership with Latin America based on equity and mutual interests turned out to confirm the same old top-down approach to north-south relations.
A free-trade agreement that floods Colombia with cheap U.S.-produced grains could drive farmers to coca production.
Scrapping tariffs can hurt poor farmers, and a deal with Colombia might boost coca production.
U.S. economic policy toward Africa has done little to promote democracy, transparency, or sustainability.
The Obama administration is pushing a free trade agreement that will have dire consequences for Koreans.
Democrats and civil society groups won important concessions on the free trade agreement with Peru. But politicians in both countries have undermined those gains.
While Canada and the US get ready to move bilaterally to beef up border security, we wonder who benefits from the proposed “security perimeter.”
How the 2008 financial crash redefined what it means to be economically vulnerable.