Sequestering Military Spending
Even if sequestration cuts across all military programs, this sort of ham-handed approach is safely doable.
Even if sequestration cuts across all military programs, this sort of ham-handed approach is safely doable.
Please join keynote speaker Thomas R. Nides, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, for a discussion of the Obama administration’s national security budget for the United States. Deputy Nides has been at the forefront of pushing for new, innovative budget measures for State and USAID operations.
The military-industrial complex is driving America to the poorhouse.
The United States is spending even more of its GDP on Afghanistan than did the Soviet Union.
As President Obama asks Republicans to cut “sacred cows” from the budget and make security budget cuts, report discusses ways to shift our security resources.
Tension between President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates over military spending may have been scripted.
How on earth do you get a bipartisan consensus against cuts and for stimulus? Call it the defense budget.
Dick Cheney was right — about one thing.
Washington seeks to beat Europe to the punch on the sale of jets to Bulgaria.
Washington and other NATO states share concerns about recent Russian defense spending.
The gap between federal spending on military as opposed to climate security has narrowed but compared to China our progress is meager.
The solution to our economic crisis lies in drastically reducing our military budget.
Despite an unusual dip in global weapons sales in 2009, the United States retained its spot as the world’s top arms supplier of developing countries, according to an authoritative new report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS).
Columnist Frida Berrigan wonders, what ever happened to peace, love, and cutting the U.S. military budget?