The Tesla Take on ‘Sharing’ the Wealth
Detroit’s automakers are lusting after the massive executive rewards in the Musk corporate empire
Detroit’s automakers are lusting after the massive executive rewards in the Musk corporate empire
Analysts across the political spectrum are challenging more than oversized CEO paychecks
When charitable intermediaries tout their generosity, reporters should take a closer look.
Commercial DAF sponsors are squirreling away money intended for charities at a greater clip than they’re giving it away.
The industry not only exploits our planet’s precious resources but makes the rest of us subsidize the extravagant lifestyles of the ultra-rich.
Hundreds of prestigious economists don’t think so. The World Bank, unfortunately, does.
The state legislature has blocked the city’s luxury real estate transfer tax for nearly four years.
A proposed tax hike on private jet fuel could raise $1.8 billion a year for sustainable transit.
Republicans want to fill the defense bill with bans on abortion, trans health care, and racial diversity initiatives in the military.
Most private foundations stick quite closely to their 5 percent payout requirement. And America’s largest are unlikely to give much more than the minimum.
Democrats introduce a bill to hike fuel taxes on private jets and invest the new revenue in public transportation.
Why are our planet’s finest hoopsters bricking free throws? Pals of plutocrats have a convenient explanation.
The IRS just released two years of long-awaited nonprofit tax filings. We found an enormous jump in DAF-to-DAF giving.
As climate change produces more misery, we will increasingly confront the question asked by Chuck Collins in his new novel: What does moral action look like against such an immoral status quo?
Congress should establish a national commission to examine the legacy of slavery and propose reparations funded by breaking up concentrated wealth in the United States.