Miriam Pemberton is a Research Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. She directs its Peace Economy Transitions Project which focuses on helping to build the foundations of a postwar economy at the federal, state and local levels. She co-chairs the Budget Priorities Working Group, the principal information-sharing collaboration of U.S. NGOs working on reducing Pentagon spending.

In addition to articles and opeds, her publications include two report series. “Military vs. Climate Security” compares federal spending on the two security domains, and argues for a shift of security resources toward mitigating climate change. “A Unified Security Budget for the United States” examined the balance of spending on military forces, homeland security and non-military foreign engagement and argues for a rebalanced security budget.

With William Hartung of the New America Foundation, she is co-editor of the book Lessons from Iraq: Avoiding the Next War (Paradigm Publishers, 2008). Formerly she was editor, researcher and finally director of the National Commission for Economic Conversion and Disarmament. She holds a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan.


Fresh Thinking on National Security

In the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, we need to make sure that every penny of our tax dollars is spent wisely.

Deficit reduction? If and only if…

How about a real solution to our deficit problem?

Swords Into Solar Panels

Owego can get solar jobs, but it will take the active involvement of Owego itself.

A Military Budget of Add-ons, Not Choices, Makes the Security Imbalance Worse

An emphasis on non-military engagement can’t hide the fact that Obama is spending more on defense than Bush.

Bush-Style Military Spending Not Over Yet

Obama’s plans for change in defense spending are still mostly unrealized.

A Unified Security Budget for the United States, FY 2010

Obama needs to shift away from his predecessor and usher in a new era of U.S. security policy.

The Secret About Jobs Military Contractors Don’t Want You to Know

A new report finds military hardware we don’t need isn’t as great for job creation as advertised.

Want Climate Security? Raise National Security Specter

The Pentagon has begun studying the effects of environment on security. But will we see real change?

Military vs. Climate Security: Mapping the Shift from the Bush Years to the Obama Era

In addition to creating an existential threat to the planet and its people, rapidly accelerating climate change is a security challenge.

Mass Transit Helps Cut Global Warming and War

We need to start viewing climate change as both a security and environmental challenge.

The Cost of the Global U.S. Military Presence

It costs $250 billion a year to maintain the U.S. empire.

The Case for an International Food Safety Agency

The latest pandemic scare seems to be easing. It’s time to get the big picture on prevention right.

Marine Protection as Empire Expansion

The Bush administration used marine protection as a cover for consolidating U.S. bases in the Pacific. The new president must reverse this policy.

The Cold War Takes a Hit

The new defense budget makes a down-payment on Obama’s promise to get rid of obsolete military systems, but maintains an upward trajectory of military spending.

The NATO Summit: Openings for a New Nuclear Posture

Key NATO members are talking nuclear reductions. But what about NATO itself?

Battle Over Bases

Rumsfeld had dreams of radically rearranging the U.S. empire of bases. Here’s what happened instead.

Budget Makes No ‘Sweeping Shift’ in Security Spending Yet

The Obama administration’s preliminary budget figures show a modest course correction to our highly militarized foreign policy.

Response to ‘Abdicating U.S. Nonproliferation Leadership’

BondGraham and Parrish respond to Wellen’s commentary on the NPT.

Anti-nuclear Nuclearism

Don’t count on the Obama administration having vigorous nuclear disarmament and antiproliferation policies that start at home.

Abdicating U.S. Nonproliferation Leadership

The tricks conservatives use to defend a Republican president for dragging his feet on nonproliferation, as well as obstructing it, are the same they will use to cast an administration that dares to be rein in nuclear weapons as soft on security.